In a CNN interview on Tuesday, Mitch McConnell (R-KY) introduced the Republican slogan, “repeal and replace”, for the fall campaigns. He goes on to say, “…we’re going to remind the American people of that in the future and hopefully we’ll be able to repeal the most egregious parts of this [health care bill] and replace them with things we could have done on a bipartisan basis much earlier this year.”
“Repeal and replace” is a catchy slogan and no doubt it will catch on with the American people. What is overlooked is that it is, in the final analysis, a slogan for surrender, the surrender of our liberty, the surrender of our Constitution, and the surrender of our future. As we have pointed out in previous blogs, “Fixing Health Care”, and others, the federal government has no authority over America’s health care –period. The so-called “general welfare clause”, “the elastic clause” or the “commerce clause” does not give them that authority and neither does any other.
In order for progressivism (American socialism) to succeed, it must first destroy our Constitution. It has been working toward that end for over a hundred years and in the last year; it has all but finished the job. All it needs now is for the Republican Party to cooperate in its destruction by attempting to “play nice” and come up with a “bi-partisan” solution for our current perceived health care crisis.
After over a century of watching progressives chip away at our Constitution and therefore our liberty, most of us still have not figured out their method of operation. At one time, we were a Constitutional Republic. Today, after passage of the health care bill, we are a progressive (American socialist) oligarchy. We did not go from republicanism to progressivism overnight. We got to where we are today one-step at a time, one compromise after another. The time for compromise and “bi-partisanship” has passed. Today it is victory or defeat.
We have been attempting to exist in a middle ground between progressivism and capitalism for generations, all the while knowing that the two are mutually exclusive. That middle ground is fast disappearing and there is no longer any ground on which to stand. Progressivism is a cancer on our body politic. It is eating away our economy, our liberty, our Constitution and our children’s future. It can no longer be tolerated by any American who loves our country and our way of life.
Our only hope for the future is elected officials that will take seriously their oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic”. Replacing an unconstitutional Democratic plan with an unconstitutional Republican plan may slow down our demise, but it will not replace the liberty we have lost. We can no longer afford to vote for a candidate simply based on his or her party label. We have to make it clear to every politician, if they want our vote they will have to support the Constitution without reservation. That is the only constitutionally mandated duty an elected official has.
Article VI makes the first duty of all officials in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal, as well as the state governments, the support of the Constitution. We are a Republic, not a Democracy. In a republic, it is the law that rules, not the will of the people, majority or otherwise. The law for our government is the Constitution of the United States; it trumps the political ambitions of politicians, the opinions of judges, and the self-serving desires of the people until it is replaced by revolution, anarchy, or lawful amendments.
Still Waiting For That Republican Form of Government?
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…” ~~Article 4, Section 4, U.S. Constitution
Throughout our history, the one thing all American Patriots have agreed on is that republicanism is the ideal political philosophy for our form of government. The Framers not only believed in this principle, they also knew what it meant.
Like patriotism, freedom, liberty, democracy and deity, republicanism is an abstract term and therefore difficult to precisely define. Most modern nations lay claim to the label of “Republic”, yet few are governed by republican principles. It is obvious that the Soviet Socialist Republics that made up the Soviet Union, The Republic of China, and the United States of America do not have the same form of government. Yet, they all bear the name “Republic”.
If Thomas Jefferson, THE champion of republicanism found its definition elusive, it is no wonder that the average American has difficulty in wrapping their mind around the concept.
In searching the Founding Documents and other writers of the era to discover the idea the Framers had in mind when they wrote Section 4 of Article IV, we come up with two principles that seem to define its core meaning: The rule of law, and representative government. Neither of these is adhered to, in the constitutional sense, by our government today.
The Rule of Law
It is true that the rule of law is necessary for an ordered society. It is equally true that the rule of law has throughout history, been the primary tool of tyranny. Therefore, it is evident that the Founding Fathers did not simply have in mind a “nation ruled by law and not by men” when they devised a republican form of government for our nation. What they meant by “republican government” was a government ruled by laws derived from a Constitution written and approved according to the collective will of all the people, clearly setting forth the authority and duties of government and restricting it to those powers only. Article VI of the Constitution declares it, along with its duly ratified Amendments to be “The Supreme Law of The Land” and “the judges in every state shall be bound thereby”.
In order for a Constitution to be effective as a basis for government it must be (a) written, (b) permanent, and (c) unchangeable other than by lawful amendment procedures. The claim by our present Administration that the Constitution is a “work in progress” to be altered and “perfected” by each succeeding generation is a contradiction of the very meaning of the word itself. It undermines the foundation of republican government and places the liberties of our citizens at the mercy of whatever group of politicians that happens to be in power at any given time.
Article I of the Constitution declares, “ALL legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States…” Through the years, Congress has devised the means for escaping responsibility and accountability for particularly onerous and unpopular laws by establishing bureaucracies and departments within the Executive Branch with “rule making” (legislative) powers. The torrent of regulations and rules flowing from these bureaucratic, regulatory agencies, sometimes by executive order and frequently by judicial mandate, are direct violations of both the letter and spirit of the Constitution which gives ALL legislative powers to the Congress.
Representative Government
Closely associated with the principle of “rule of law”, is that of “representative government“. It was clearly the intent of the Framers that law governing the activities and welfare of the people would be made by representatives, chosen by them, to serve in this capacity for a short period of time. While Congress collectively may be said to be elected by the people, individually each member is elected by less than one percent of the total population.
It is this fact, among others, that prompted the Framers to place strict restraints on the powers of Congress, limiting it to matters of national necessity. James Madison summed up the powers of the national government in Federalist No. 41.
These “enumerated powers” are spelled out in Article I, Section 8 and emphasized in the Tenth Amendment. For a commentary on the more controversial ones click HERE.
The idea of a federal legislature, not accountable to the collective will of the people, making laws affecting the lives all the people regardless of their unique circumstances and needs, was precisely what the Founders were attempting to avoid when they established a republican form of government with clear boundaries between the powers of the national and state governments.
This principle has been so corrupted over the past century that we now find ourselves in the absurd position where citizens of our poorest states are taxed to fund the profligate spending of those in some of our richest states; Where frugal and productive citizens find the fruits of their labor confiscated from them “by law” to provide luxuries to citizens in other states who are less productive and less frugal than themselves.
That a Congresswoman elected by a fraction of the citizens of one state can dominate legislation and spending affecting the citizens of all states, or that a Senator from one of our least populous states can impose his will by legislation on the most minute details of the lives of more than three hundred millions of citizens would be unthinkable by our Founding Fathers.
It is these perversions of government that have led to revolutions in the past and will again in the future, if allowed to go unchecked. Whether the revolution takes place at the ballot box or in the streets remains to be seen.
Share this:
Leave a comment
Posted in Barack Obama, bill of rights, commentary, Constitution, enumerated powers, founding fathers, Politics, scope of government
Tagged Constitution, enumerated powers, founding documents, Founding fathers, framers, james madison, limited government, Republic, republican government, republicanism, Thomas Jefferson